Gödel Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we combine fuzzy set theory and argumentation to facilitate the use of fuzzy arguments and attacks. Unlike many existing approaches, our work does not require the use of any parameters, bringing it closer to Dung’s work in spirit. We begin by introducing Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks, and specialise them using the Gödel t-norm. We then examine this framework’s properties and show that the standard Dung extensions are obtained, though the stable semantics coincide with the preferred. Finally, we examine the relationship between our framework and Dung’s original system, as well as the existing fuzzy frameworks, describing where they overlap and differ.
منابع مشابه
A Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge
Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning from incomplete and potentially inconsistent knowledge. Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) is a defeasible argumentation formalism based on an extension of logic programming. Although DeLP has been successfully integrated in a number of different real-world applications, D...
متن کاملA logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
In the last decade defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning. The logic programming paradigm has shown to be particularly useful for developing different argument-based frameworks on the basis of different variants of logic programming which incorporate defeasible rules. Most of such frameworks, however, are unable...
متن کاملSome properties of Janssen's Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
The majority of approaches to abstract argumentation with fuzziness yield some number as part of the computation process, which is then compared to some threshold in order to determine which arguments should appear in an extension. However, identifying such a threshold is difficult, and a more natural approach therefore involves representing the extension as a fuzzy set of arguments. Such an ap...
متن کاملMulti-Valued and Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we further progress the analysis of the recently introduced multi-valued argumentation frameworks ( ). are an extension of Dung’s abstract argumentation, where arguments have a degree of truth associated with them. Here we describe a list of properties of considering the major multi-valued logics such as those proposed by Gödel, Zadeh and Łukasiewicz. We then propose a computation...
متن کاملFuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
We propose fuzzy argumentation frameworks as a conservative extension of traditional argumentation frameworks[6]. The fuzzy approach enriches the expressive power of the classical argumentation model by allowing to represent the relative strength of the attack relationships between arguments, as well as the degree to which arguments are accepted. Furthermore, we explore the relationship with fu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016